Publications
SURVEILLE publications for public dissemination
SURVEILLE was an interdisciplinary research project where most partners were academic institutions. Much of the work was based on scenarios developed to represent real or possible usage situations of surveillance technologies which were then assessed from a range of different scholarly perspectives. Every deliverable mentions its responsible authors who in each case represented one or more scientific disciplines. The results presented in the deliverables flow from the research conducted by the respective authors and does not entail endorsement by all other project partners. This is true also for the two end-user partners of the project (EFUS and MERPOL) that provided valuable input and comments into the process but that were not asked to endorse the findings made through the research.
WP2 – Survey of surveillance technologies
D2.2.Paper with Input from End Users
D2.3 Paper by Local Authorities End Users
D2.6 Matrix of Surveillance Technologies
D2.7 Update of D2.1 on the basis of input of other partners
D2 8 SURVEILLE Paper on a Terrorism Prevention Scenario
SURVEILLE NSA paper based on D2.8
D2.9 Consolidated survey of surveillance technologies
WP3 – Perceptions and effectiveness of surveillance
D3.2 Review of European level studies on perceptions
D3.3 System effectiveness efficiency and satisfaction assessment
D3.3b System Effectiveness and Efficiency-Data Protection
D3.4 Design of a research methodology for assessing
D3.6 Report on methodology and criteria for incorporating perception issues
D3.8 Report combining results of all effectiveness research
WP4: Law and Ethics of Surveillance Technologies
D4.1 The use of surveillance technologies for the prevention and investigation of serious crimes
D4.2 Paper on legal issues related to the use of surveillance data for profiling
D4.3 Comparative law paper on data retention regulation in a sample of EU member states
D4.4 Ethics and surveillance in authoritarian and liberal states
D4.5 Surveillance the moral presumption of innocence
D4.6 Report of Project Meeting No. 4
D4.7 The scope of the right to privacy in public places
D4.8. Ethical analysis of the right to privacy in different locations
D4.9.Ethical case study on profiling at the border
D4.10 Synthesis report from WP4
WP5 – Stakeholder Interaction
D5.1 Report of Project Meeting No 1
D5.2 Report of First Three Interactions with Law Enforcement Professionals in a Training Context
D5.3 Report of Second Annual Forum for Decision-Makers
D5.4 Report of Final Three Interactions with Law Enforcement Professionals in a Training Context
D5.5 Report of the Third Annual Forum for Decision-Makers
D5.9 Report incorporating evaluation data of the Advisory Service
D5.10 Summary of the Advice of the Advisory Service
WP6 – Dissemination
D6.3 Coordinator’s first report on SURVEILLE dissemination work
D6.4 Coordinator’s second report on SURVEILLE dissemination work
D6.5 Coordinator’s third report on SURVEILLE dissemination work
D6.6 Report of Final Conference
SURVEILLE Briefing Note